The Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) has entered a new chapter after the death of its long-time leader, Raila Odinga.
For many years, ODM’s strength and identity came from Raila’s bold leadership and his firm stand as the voice of the opposition.
But with Raila gone, the party now faces a new political reality — one that demands change, compromise, and new leadership.
This week, ODM Secretary-General Edwin Sifuna surprised many when he announced that the party will remain part of the Government of National Unity until 2027.
For a man known for strongly criticizing President William Ruto’s administration, this softer tone marked a big shift — both for Sifuna and for ODM.
ODM has always been known as the party of opposition — the one that challenges government decisions and fights for reforms. But now, it seems the party wants to influence change from inside the government rather than from the streets.
Sifuna’s statement shows a new strategy: to cooperate rather than confront.
It may not please everyone in the party, especially younger leaders like Babu Owino and Caleb Amisi who prefer ODM to stay firm in opposition.
However, Sifuna seems to believe that working with the government is the best way to keep ODM relevant and united.
Raila Odinga was more than a leader — he was the glue that held ODM together. His charisma and political wisdom helped manage internal disagreements and kept supporters motivated. Now that he is gone, the party must learn to stand on its own.
Sifuna’s recent move is therefore not just about politics — it’s about survival. By keeping ODM in the unity government, he is trying to prevent divisions and power struggles within the party.
ODM must now reinvent itself for the future. The Kenya of 2027 will not be the same as the Kenya Raila once dominated. Young people, especially the Gen Z generation, are demanding accountability and fresh ideas.
To stay relevant, ODM must listen to this new generation and present itself as a party of action, not just talk.
Sifuna’s shift could be the start of that transformation — a move from street protests to policy discussions, from anger to action.
