Usikimye has issued an official response following a wave of allegations circulating online, confirming that the matter is now before the courts. The organisation, headed by activist Njeri Migwi, says it has referred the issues to the judicial system and is fully cooperating with the legal process.
The controversy stems from what was initially described as an internal dispute involving Migwi and former co-founder Stella Khachina, which later spilled into the public domain. Since then, a series of allegations have emerged on social media, including claims of financial mismanagement of funds meant to support survivors of Gender-Based Violence (GBV).
Additional accusations shared online allege that Migwi may have shielded her son by allegedly covering up concerns related to a case of grooming. Other claims further suggest that the organisation may have fabricated stories of GBV survivors to solicit funds from the public. Usikimye and Migwi have not admitted to these claims.
In an official board statement dated 17 December 2025, Usikimye said it was committed to transparency, accountability, and safeguarding survivors. The Board of Directors stated that upon receiving the allegations, it convened in line with governance and safeguarding policies and sought professional advice before deciding on the next steps.
According to the statement, the board resolved that the matter should be handled through the formal legal system rather than internal processes alone, citing the need for fairness, independence, and integrity for all parties involved. Usikimye confirmed that the case was referred to court on 31 October 2025 and is currently active within the judicial system.
Despite the controversy, the organisation said it remains fully operational and continues to offer survivor-centred services to individuals affected by GBV. The board also urged the public, partners, and supporters to respect the judicial process as it unfolds, noting that further updates would be provided when legally permissible.
Migwi has shared the board statement on her social media platforms, reiterating that the matter is in court and should be allowed to follow due process.
