In every political season, nations develop a curious tendency: citizens either magnify achievements or deliberately ignore them, depending on where their loyalties lie, and Kenya is no exception.
Today, as the country approaches the midterm of President William Ruto’s administration, a silent but visible narrative is emerging: many are pretending not to see what the president has done.
From infrastructure expansion to digital transformation, from Hustler Fund disbursements to aggressive tax reforms, the Ruto government has rolled out numerous initiatives meant to steer Kenya towards economic self-reliance. Yet, in the political marketplace, perception often outweighs policy.
Supporters view Ruto as a determined reformer, battling entrenched systems while laying the groundwork for long-term growth. Critics, however, see his agenda as overambitious and burdensome, particularly amid rising living costs and unpopular taxation measures.
Between these extremes lies a segment of Kenyans who quietly acknowledge progress but choose to remain silent — either out of political caution or the fear of contradicting popular opinion.
It is intellectually dishonest to deny that some sectors have recorded visible progress. Road projects continue, agricultural subsidies have returned in new forms, and university funding reforms are being attempted despite some resistance.
The government’s engagement in foreign investment and diplomatic rebranding has also enhanced Kenya’s visibility internationally.
Still, legitimate questions remain: Are these policies translating into relief for ordinary citizens? Are the benefits reaching the grassroots? The answers depend on one’s position in the economic pyramid.
But what is evident is that politics has blinded many to facts. It has become fashionable to dismiss or downplay any government effort simply because it originates from the ‘wrong’ camp.
This selective amnesia undermines public discourse and weakens our collective ability to hold leaders accountable.
As Kenya heads toward 2027, both praise and criticism should be guided by truth, not tribal loyalty or political bitterness.
Pretending not to see what President Ruto has done — good or bad — is a betrayal of our civic duty to think critically and speak honestly.
The writer is Dr Philip Chebunet, a lecturer and political communication expert.
